Skip to Content
Advocating for the Rights of Our Clients Nationwide 312-313-1613
Top

Bank of America Whistleblowers: BofA Lied to Homeowners, Incentivized Foreclosures

|

If you have ever applied for a loan modification on your own, then you may have encountered some very frustrating situations. I frequently hear about homeowners being asked to send and re-send documents. I have spoken to people who sent in all of their documents, but were denied a loan modification because they failed to provide documents to the bank.

It turns out that, at least for Bank of America, these problems were most likely by design. ProPublica is reporting that six BofA employees recently filed affidavits in a class-action lawsuit; the affidavits describe the bank's efforts to mislead homeowners and incentivize foreclosures. According to the affidavits, BofA employes were told to lie to homeowners, claiming that documents in a loan modification file hadn't yet been received. Supervisors would tell employees that admitting the documents had been received caused problems for the bank because HAMP guidelines require an answer within a specific timeframe.

Even more shocking is that the bank would periodically issue mass loan denials to purge large numbers of homeowners out of the system at a rate of 600 to 1500 files at a time. Employees would deny any file with documents that were more than 60 days old and would often provide bogus reasons for the denial of the loan mod.

The bank also incentivized foreclosures. In some months, employees that referred ten or more files to foreclosure would receive a $500 bonus.

On the whole, the statements in the affidavits confirm what I had already suspected. In addition to failing to provide adequate staffing (some loan modficiation underwriters had 400 open files at any given time), the bank incentivized foreclosure and encouraged employees to lie to homeowners. It makes me wonder whether the 49 state attorneys general and the DOJ were aware of this behavior when the National Mortgage Settlement was negotiated. If so, then the settlement was seriously undervalued.

Once upon a time, people borrowed money from local banks. They probably knew their banker. Over time, banks consolidated and combined. Now, we have several megabanks and far fewer local lenders. When people banked locally, it was easier to trust the banker because he lived down the street. Even though we now tend to deal with faceless people in remote call centers, many people still think that they can trust their banks.

Hopefully, stories like this one will help curb that belief.